The Parable of the Home and Land

There was a home that had been owned for over 100 years by the same family. They enjoyed where they lived because the land around the home was plentiful for growing their own food, and making a life for themselves and their future generations. Now many years ago, previous to the land and home being bought and owned by the present owners, there was a different family that had owned the land, but because they had failed to keep the land and the home and it was sold at auction because the one who had sold the land to them, told them how it was to be zoned, and what kind of home had to be built, etc. and they didn't listen, so the home and it's land went to the present owners.
These same former home and land owners decided they wanted the land and home back, though it rightfully had been sold to it's new owners. So one day they decided with the help of a different land owner, in a different country, to take the land by force. Now, you must understand they had no right to this land, as they once did, before they failed to listen to the seller , the King and they were removed from the home and land they once owned.
So, they forcefully moved back into part of the land and part of the home. Though they had broke all laws, the country from far away who had helped them take it by force, continued to supply the thief with all the arms and force it needed to steal away the home and farm. They even convinced these land owners from far way that they would be very blessed by their King, if they would go along with their trickery. The owners now having their land and home partially taken from them, were doing the best they could to hold onto what little they had. However, the country far away was much more powerful and had lots of arms and they begin to threaten the home owners as well with direct interdiction if they didnt keep moving out little by little so the former land and home owners could continue to steal away from what was their own. They also decided the best way to go about this was to tell them they could have no weapons to protect themselves, or else. Yet, while the new home owners were listening out of great fear to the threats made, the old home and land owners, who had stolen part of their home and land were still acquiring the same weapons they the rightful owners were denied to own.
Matter of fact the thieves were daily aiming these weapons at them and firing them and killing them within their own homeland. Every now and then one of the home owners would fire back at them, but this only made things worse for them, because the country from afar would take the side of the attackers and threaten them again with not only their great weapons, but these weapons were also in the hands of their enemy- the home and land thief.
Now, across the world many kingdoms had come together in unison to try to maintain peace across the world, and they had even declared what the old land and home owner was doing was in violation of their laws. The ally of the thieves, cared not for their laws or their enforcement of them, so they went right on giving arms to the thieves, and threatening the people who truly owned the land and home now.
The worst part of it all, the ally to the thieves now claimed that anyone that was kin to the rightful owners of the land, no matter where they lived in the world also couldn't have these weapons to protect their home and land. For those that were kin feared these people and their ally, for they knew how they could come and steal what was rightfully theirs, so whatever they could do to hold on to what they owned this they would do, though the ally of the thieves made threats and fired their weapons at them as well.
Now along comes the King of the people who had given their land to the new owners and declares they are wrong, The thieves didn't care, they wanted the land so bad, that they killed the king and then told a lie, to their allies as well, that before the King died, (at their hands unknown to most), that he had declared the land and home was rightfully theirs and to not help them acquire it and protect it, they would be going against the King himself who had been the most powerful King of all Kingdoms. However, the King was so great that, he came back to life, and all those that placed their loyalty to him were his subjects, in no matter what land or home they lived in. He decided to get out of the land business into the heart business. The thieves would still not proclaim him King even after His resurrection, they were so bent on owning the land and the home they had lost, that nothing mattered more, and even those in the land they had stolen and the home they had invaded, were thought their enemy, as many in these lands had given their allegiance to Him. These who had went into the heart business as well in the land and home they truly owned, but the great land owner from far away, was so convinced that the people who stole the land were right and they believed the King was crazy now for changing his ways from land owner to heart owner, they continued to persist in helping the evil thieves in their taking from all the kinsmen their land and yet proclaiming at the same time an allegiance to the risen King.
They even convinced many of those who proclaimed this same allegiance to think they were serving the King if they would help in their goal to own all the lands and all the homes of the kinsmen who rightfully held ownership to the land. That they would be serving the King's wishes if they only changed his ideas back from heart to land ownership. They did well at this. They so convinced these that allegiance to the King and His rule over all men, that they contributed millions of dollars and speeches and wrote laws to allow the ally of the evil country to continue to break the Kings true purposes and that was to win the heart of all people in all lands, of all races.
Now, when the king asked of his subjects what they would do, if someone came to them and told them that He had given them a right to their home and their land, and forcefully removing them, while all the time lying and proclaiming His kingship to them, what would they do?
Of course, they held so tightly to the idea what was theirs was theirs, they said, they would fight back and keep what was theirs. Yet, while out of one part of their heart they understood their ownership of what was theirs, they went right on acting the opposite and contined to be disloyal to the King and His purposes. Then one day these same liars and hypocrites came and stole their land and homes as well, but they did it with subtleness, they convinced them that they really still owned it all, but giving them the rule over them would protect them from the kinsmen of the rightful owners of the land and home farway. They needed their protection as well so, the ally begin to serve the evil land and home takers every wish. While the King the true King was left with very few subjects, and when they spoke out against the thieves and the lies, they too were considered to be kinsmen to the rightful owners and were persecuted awfully and then came the day, they were killed by many who laid claim to their own personal ownership, and that of the thieves, but no one elses.

Now unto you it is given to understand the Parable.

Dr. J.

The Puritan, The Hebrew and America Revisioned

I have written before how, there are those in this nation, who lay claim to the idea that we are a "Chosen Nation of God" and they are doing their best to make their vote be the most important vote that a candidate can obtain. We are in essence taking dog's and having them to pretend they are holy Christians just so they can obtain votes. All one has to do as portray the idea that you are Christian, pro-life (which is baloney anyway, most of the prolifers I know are like Bush Pro-War- which is far from being Pro-Life), you believe in the Ten Commandments and on the list goes, depending on which denomination you are from.
The Christian Zionist and Christian Nationalist forget we have already had the experience once in this nation of a society that was driven by the conception of Christian law.
They were called the Puritans.
They dicatated everything about your life.
The people as a whole were liberty-loving in the extreme, but the individual was restrained at every step by laws that no free people of today would tolerate for an hour. Paternalism in government was the rule in the other colonies and in Europe, but nowhere was it carried to such an extreme as in New England.
Here the civil law laid its hand upon the citizen in his business and social relations; it regulated his religious affairs, it dictated his dress, and even invaded the home circle and directed his family relations. One law forbade the wearing of lace, another of "slashed cloaths other than one slash in each sleeve and another in the back." The length and width of a lady's sleeve was solemnly decided by law. It was a penal offense for a man to wear long hair, or to smoke in the street, or for a youth to court a maid without the consent of her parents. A man was not permitted to kiss his wife in public. Captain Kimble, returning from a three-years' ocean voyage, kissed his wife on his own doorstep and spent two hours in the stocks for his "lewed and unseemly behavior".

How far will the new Christian Nationalist take us down this road of their revisioned history to gain power in politics rather than power over sin in their own individual lives?

Will we become a people that will drag homosexuals out into the street, and hang them or stone them. Or will we be a people that presents the forgiveness and love of God to them and offer them an opportunity for repentance and faith in Jesus Christ? Will we brand those that are caught in adultery? Will we put people back into stocks on the courthouse yard? Will we take prostitutes out into a field and stone them. Perhaps we will do as the Puritans did, even hang those we think are practicing witchcraft or burn them at the stake. Those that even think they can rule this nation through laws they want to define as Christian are guilty of breaking these laws. Yet, they persist. They call themselves, Pro-life, well I am Pro-Life- I believe all life is precious to the Father, and therefore I am also truly Pro-life in that I am pro-anti-resistant to war, any war for any cause - creates death and destruction. So, out of one side of your mouth you proclaim - Thou Shall Not Murder, yet we back a candidate who has been responsible for more murders than you can count. He began as Governor of Texas, more people died under his governship from capital punishment then any other governor, even one who claimed to be a sister in Christ was murdered by the State by his decision.
Pro-Life- that is a joke.
I would like to provide you with a website to read, something written which is the simple Gospel for Pro-Zionist, and all those who get on the Ten Commandment band wagon. I recommend you read below his article from http://www.apuritansmind.com/Tracts%20and%20Writings/KeepingTheLaw.htm

In the end, would you like to have every aspect of your life from what you wear, to what you do on Sabbath or the Lord's Day dictated by a few and the powerful, as the Puritans did. We have already realized once in this country the terrible results of this kind of thinking, do we have to relive it again. Study history, what the Christian Nationalist, and Pro-Zionist are pushing for in this country has already happened once in this country and many times throughout history and the world. The results were not freedom or liberty as found in Jesus Christ but a very narrow conscriptive way of life for all involved.

There is nothing greater that threatens religious liberty and the freedom of men than a government that is religious.
Dr. J.

With all this in mind - ask yourself again - How well do "I" keep the Law?

This was the summation of Dr. C. Matthew McMahon and his writing if you read it, on his web site called a Puritan's Mind.

Christian Nationalism and Article 6 - Clause 3

I have long been bothered by the notion of Christian Nationalism, and this as a Christian.
It is a scary idea and as dangerous as any totalitarian ideas that have come along in a very long time.
It is a movement that purports to have come up with a complete governing program from the Bible, and with that they claim divine sanction for a campaign of national renewal. It promotes a revisionist history in which the founders were conservative Christians who never meant to separate church and state, and in which America's true Christian character has been subverted by several generations of God-hating leftists.

America admittedly has been subverted, but it isn't because Christians weren't in positions of power and money. The church today is wealthy, and it has always had the right to exercise vote on issues. What happened, Christians were less concerned with social and political changes for the "all" then they were with investing money into building funds, expansion of their particular denominational ideas, and sitting quietly in their pews. While sin will continue until Christ returns, legislation will not create a redeemed man, woman or child.
Only the life of Christ can do this. It is apparent that the problem doesn't lie so much in our form of government, but those that are governed who have lived ungodly lives and lived in religious institutions, hiding from the world.

Christian Nationalist dogma has very scary results. History has proven this time after time. any religious group no matter what they subscribe to, always ends badly.

Let's see how our forefathers first solved the problem when the government disinherited any one religion from running this country.

Article Six, Clause 3 states: "The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States."

Now this is true separation of Church from State.

Now to the liberals, this never meant a man couldn't be a Christian and serve in a political position as they would like to see.

What it meant was that government would never make the mistake of creating an alliance with any one religous view to rule the masses based on it's concepts of justice or other.
Religious equality was it's purpose.
It was a radical idea, that has protected us all from tyranny for a very long time.

To quote from a source;

But its hard to get around the simple fact that there is no mention of God or Christianity anywhere in the Constitution. This was not because the Framers were irreligious. It was because they believed in religious freedom and did not want the government to interfere in religious affairs. Nor did they want the abuses of power that come from commonly state power with the power of the clergy. Its true that the words "separation of church and state" do not appear in the Constitution or any of the amendments.
But the meaning has been unambiguously been there from the beginning.

The danger of Christian Nationalism, is that a very few are to dictate for the all, what is good, what is evil, what is allowed, what isn't allowed, and so on. This is totalitarianism in it's fullest definition. Who will decide, that their interpertation of law that they extropolate from scripture is truth? Who will exercise judgement of these laws? Men? Men, that simply because they say they are Christian will rule above all others and all other concepts of justice and equality. This is dangerous. This creates despots and dictators. What one must never forget is:

"All have sinned and come short of the glory of God."

History is already written and overrun with the story of those who thought they were God's specially called individual to create the "City of God", from Popes, clergymen to political leaders. It always has resulted in a preponderance of blood shed, inquisitions, war, and power exercised over the impoverished.
When will Christians see that in the Old Testament that they so suddenly want to rule with, the folly of a people who thought they could keep the law, Israel. The law is the schoolmaster to Christ.
For Christians, we need to less concern ourselves with making law and dictating that law, as bringing others to Christ. We are called as ministers of reconciliation. All of us who claim the name of Christ.

Politics and the Law is not where souls are saved.

People get saved when they see God's love and forgiveness. Yes, judgement is part of God's plan but it is just that it belongs to God and not us. Now someday when Christ our Judge and Lawgiver returns there will be a true "theocracy" once again worldwide, but only Christ can judge righteously and without bias. Only those that this flesh has been cut from completely and finally in our total transformation from what we are now, a fallen man, saved only because of the grace of God to the revelation of being the true sons of God, will we be able to judge righteously.

It doesn't promote Christianity, but Artice 6, Clause 3, is very wise in the context of things and prevents, any one denomination, religion or other to be the test for serving in these positions of political power.
Let me ask the Baptist, would you be happy if all the Congressman and Legislators were Catholic? Of course not. What if all the Congressman and Legislators were Baptist. What then would become of the law of the land? Would it appease all those divided denominations to be ruled by others of another because they to can lay claim to be Christian as being defined by the leaders of these Christian Nationalistic ideas. Would you accept a Mormon, or A Jehovah Witness, or a Unitarian, who also say they are Christian.
Of course not, you would define and dictate what YOU consider Christian and all others would be overruled. Who would decide what is Christian and what isn't - a few over the all?

I will say as a Christian that there must have been some tremendous wisdom that did come from a higher authority to come up with Article 6, Clause 3.
I would prefer to think as a Christian that God would prefer we leave as it is. We need to quit trying to revise history to make people believe lies. Get busy living and preaching the Good News, and get out of the pulpits of preaching a moral majority rightness that you are allowing others to dictate. You want to see the world turned upside down for Jesus, get up out of your pews and reachout to the hurting, the AIDS victims, the poor, the orphan, the widow, the drug addict and more. Let love become real!
I promise you will see a change in America and it won't come from legislating and punishing anyone that disagrees with you. It will come because the love of God will be shed abroad in their hearts. Love conquers all.

Sin has it's consequenses, and we all live with them. Trying to legislate righteousness didn't work for Israel and it won't work for America. A changed people, that are truly the reflection of God's love toward men, this will change America.

It is dangerous to think you can trample on the choice of others, because you decide what is wrong or right and most often from a fleshly self centered interpretation of scripture.

I am not getting on the boat to these ideas of Christian Nationalism. My hope is not in these kingdoms, which are all false and ungodly. My hope is in the Kingdom of God, where Christ rules MY life.

Quit worrying about everyone else, and get concerned with yourself. What sins are you hiding now? What things in your life need to be brought under the kingship of Jesus?

Now if you being a man, of failure in so many areas of your life, how can you possible expect to rule America while you are a sinner. "Judge not less you might be judged."

I think our forefathers had more foresight than any Christian Nationalist when they wrote Article 6 , Clause 3.

With such wisdom, it had to be clearly the intervention of a wise and loving God.

Now if you want to say our forefathers were all Christians and re-write history, go ahead. But before you do, perhaps then you will look at the godly wisdom they had to write this in the Constitution and yet you want to change it. What does that say about this unChristian movement wanting to make a correlation between the cross and the flag. I say it spells the words out clearly - IDOLATRY AND PRIDE.

You're wrong, flat wrong! Christian Nationalism is dangerous to your spiritual health.
REPENT while you can, before it's too late, and the new RELIGIOUS LEADER OF THE WORLD IS DECLARED by the Christian Nationalist, the Christian Zionist. From this unholy union they preach will arise a world False Prophet for sure! Don''t be fooled.

Dr. J.

George Washington - A Christian?

There is an argument that has continued especially in recent days with the movement of the right wing moralist, Christian Nationalist, that George Washington was a Christian and not a Dietist. Dr. Kenendy of Coral Ridge Ministries argues for this stand profusely in his attempt to make us all believe that America is suppose to be a Theocracy ruled by God and therefore all American does and is, we are a country founded by God. I take issue with Dr. Kennedy who looks past the best of evidence that George Washington was not a Christian but a Free Mason.

Now it may be true, he spoke of Christianity, he spoke of God, he spoke of the Bible, he even was a busy churchman.
In NO way does this ever prove he was Christian. Why can I say this with such assertiveness, Simply, because a man goes to church, uses the name of God, and talks in Christian terms, never defines a Christian. Let's look at some facts contrary to Dr. Kennedy- being a churchman, would put anyone that goes to church as a Christian, the facts are George was a Free Mason.
Look at these matters:

Many legends circulate about the masonic activities of George Washington. Below is a list of documentable masonic occurrences within the lifetime of George Washington. Indeed, some lore about the various lodges that he may have visited are surely true, but without written contemporary proof, do not appear in this list. In addition to these masonic lodges, ceremonies and celebrations, at least fourteen letters survive written by Washington to various masonic lodges and grand lodges expressing his esteem for the fraternity. He owned at least two masonic aprons, three masonic constitutions and a masonic jewel, as seen in his estate papers at the time of his death in 1799. The facts can be researched and proven true, if one takes the time to look them up.

For example from George Washingtons Mount Vernon Estate and Gardens - Answers comes the following: Do you have a record of his membership in Freemasonry? The answer is: George Washington became a Freemason in 1753, when he was accepted at Lodge Number 4 in Fredericksburg, Virginia. Just 21 years old at the time, he remained a Mason until his death in 1799, when he was laid to rest following both Episcopal and Masonic funeral rites. While Mount Vernon has a few pieces of Masonic memorabilia, we do not have correspondence other documentation dealing with his membership in that organization. We suggest you contact the Masonic Memorial in Alexandria, Virginia. Email: gseghers@gwmemorial.org. Phone: 703-683-2007. Web site: www.gwmemorial.org. So I did just that via the Internet. Here is the timetable presented. 1752 November 4 Fredericksburg Lodge No. 4, Initiated as Entered Apprentice 1753 March 3 Fredericksburg Lodge No. 4, Passed to Fellow Craft August 4 Fredericksburg Lodge No. 4, Raised to Master Mason 1778 December 28 St. John the Evangelist celebration, marched in masonic procession 1779 June 24 St. John the Baptist celebration, marked with American Union Military Lodge at West Point, NY. December 20 Proposed by the Grand Lodge of Pennsylvania as General Grand Master of the United States, however never enacted. December 27 St. John the Evangelist celebration, celebrated with American Union Military Lodge at Morristown, NJ 1781 October Reportedly visited Lodge No. 9 at Yorktown, VA with General Lafayette after defeat of British General Cornwallis 1782 Brothers Watson and Cassoul of Nantes, France, present Washington with exquisite silk masonic apron, acknowledged by letter August 10 June 24 St. John the Baptist celebration, marked with American Union Military Lodge at West Point, NY. December 27 St. John the Evangelist celebration, marked with Solomon’s Lodge No. 1, Poughkeepsie, NY 1784 June 24 St. John the Baptist celebration, marked with Alexandria Lodge, Alexandria, VA June 24 Made and honorary member of Alexandria Lodge No. 39 (Now Alexandria-Washington Lodge, No. 22) Alexandria, VA August Presented a masonic apron made by Madame de Lafayette by General and Bro. de Lafayette 1785 February 12 Walked in masonic funeral procession for Bro. William Ramsay at Alexandria, VA 1788 April 28 Named charter Worshipful Master of Alexandria Lodge No. 22 when a new charter from the Grand Lodge of Virginia was issued. Unanimously reelected Master December 20, 1788 for one year. 1789 Elected honorary member of Holland Lodge No. 8, New York, NY April 30 Inaugurated President of the United States using Bible from St. John’s Lodge No. 1, New York, NY 1791 April 15 Welcomed by members of St. John’s Lodge No. 2, New Bern, NC May Received the greetings of the Grand Lodge of South Carolina by General Mordecai Gist, Grand Master, Charleston, SC 1793 September 18 Acting Grand Master, laid the cornerstone for the United States Capitol, Washington, DC 1794 Sat for William Williams, portraitist, in Masonic regalia at the request of Alexandria Lodge 1797 March 28 Received a masonic delegation from Alexandria Lodge 1798 April 1 Attended Alexandria Lodge No. 22, and proposed a toast at the banquet that followed. 1799 December 18 Buried at Mt. Vernon with masonic rites as well as those of the church, conducted by Alexandria Lodge No. 22 ----------------------------------------- If any body should know a Mason it would be another Mason, these records are drawn from their records and Washingtons estate records.

Now it would seem that Dr. Kennedy and the so called presuppositional research of those trying to prove George was a Christian they manage to throw truth out with the bathwater. It is easy for a man to be misunderstood as to what he believes simply because he or she uses Christian terms, attends a church or other is involved in so called Christian activities..

This is proved through many cults, and understanding how important semantics become in defining what they really believe..

One, must look behind what is said and how it is defined.

Free Masons have infiltrated American churches for centuries.

When I was in Bible school I had a Bible teacher who was not only a Baptist ordained minister he was a 32nd degree Mason. I understood Free Masonry because I had read everything I could get my hands on them from the time I was 15 years of age. I had found Albert Pike's book "Morals and Dogma in an old abandoned home alongside a creek we played in where I lived in Richardson, Texas. I was fascinated with all it's mysterious philosphy, and dogma and more and it's initiations and steps to reach each degree.

I later picked up some additional books on Free Masons, written by them, and came to realize by age 20, what they had was truly a cult, anti-Christian, and that they believed in Lucifer as a good and works salvation. So, when this teacher would speak things that I found were very religous, but not scriptural, I would challenge him. He hated the challenges because he could never give a consistent answer from scripture. He had all the venacular and speech you would think a Christian had, he even had a church he pastored as a Southern Baptist.

Along with my coming to understand their teachings and dogma, my best friend and his friend when I was young were DeMolay members. I had talked with him, and knew a lot about what went on in the meetings for the youth. I was well informed, and I knew in my heart of heart, that all the references to God, Jesus Christ, and salvation, etc. was as evil and cultic as anything I had come across.

They were not Orthodox and surely not defined by scripture.

George Washington was a Deitist/Church Goer and a Free Mason.

He was not Christian because it is impossible for the two to be compatible in doctrine or faith.

Regardless, how hard the Dr. Kennedy's of this world, who pride themselves in wearing their Doctorate garb with it's stripes on the sleeve while spewing garbage out of their mouth. telling lies, is telling lies.

Let's look at some other facts.

On September 18, 1793, the cornerstone of the Capitol was officially laid. The Grand Lodge of Maryland presided over the ceremony and George was asked to serve as Master. The affiliated Lodges under Maryland's jurisdiction were in attendance, as was his own Lodge from Alexandria. There was a great procession, which included a company of artillery. Then came a band, followed by himself, attended by all officers and members of the Lodges in full Masonic regalia.

When George reached the trench in which the northeast cornerstone was laid, he was presented with a silver plate commemorating the event and inscribed with the designations of the Lodges in attendance. The artillery fired a volley. He then descended into the trench and placed the plate on the stone. Around it was placed containers of corn, wine and oil. All present joined in prayer, and the artillery fired another volley.

All of this was part to Free Masonry dedication of buildings.

On August 4, 1753, George Washington became a Master Mason, the highest rank in the Fraternity of Freemasonry, in his hometown of Fredericksburg, Virginia. The 21-year-old young man would soon hold his first military commission.

For George Washington, joining the masons was a rite of passage and an expression of civic responsibility. Members were required to express their belief in a Supreme Being and in the immortality of the soul. Masons were also expected to obey the civil law, hold a high moral standard, and practice acts of charity.

36 years after he became a 3rd degree Mason, on April 30, 1789, George was inaugurated as the first President of the United States with John Adams as Vice-President. The oath that George took was administered by the Grand Master of the Masonic Grand Lodge of New York. Both the Marshal of the day and his escort were generals in the United States Army and Masons. The Bible on which he swore his oath was that of St John's Lodge of New York. George, himself, was Master of the Lodge at Alexandria, Virginia.

Six years and three months later, in December, 1799, George Washington died. He was buried at his home at Mount Vernon, with full Masonic honors, by the Alexandria Lodge, whose members were his pallbearers.

There is no question that Masonry contributed something to the structures and machinery of the American government. The Constitution of the United States, in a very real sense, is a Masonic document. In its final form, the Constitution represented the collective thoughts of Ben Franklin, Edmund Randolph, Thomas Jefferson, John Adams and George Washington. Of these, all but Jefferson were not only active Masons, but men who took their Freemasonry extremely seriously.

Now, many ministers and their congregation both Anglican and Episcopalian during these times subscribed to both Deism and Christianity . George may have had some Christian views that were in contrast to Deism in that he thought "Providence" did intervene in history whereas most Deist do not. This in no way changes the facts, that he was a Free Mason, and with all that I can proclaim- to subscribe to Free Mason teachings one CANNOT be a Christian.

There are many Free Mason that are serious churchmen. Attending the man made temples, and listening to men who like to stand in the market places with their phalacteries and long flowing robes, and gain the attention of all.They especially enjoy this as the sole speaker for a church group. This doesn't make one a Christian. Regardless of what you believe - George may have had some "good" ideas, and some "christian ideas" but in so doing and in no way states that he was "born again " of the Spirit of God and a man abiding in Christ.

It amazes me to the extent that "Christian Nationalist" will go to try to take truth and twist it for their agenda to eventually establish their ideas of a theocracy for all of us, and how quick they are to return this country to rule by the Old Testament shadows, for their sake of definition of what Christianity is, which is nothing more than Judaism with Talmudic law, and Free Mason concepts. They have commited idolatry and adulterous whoredom mixing Christ with national political ideas. To say that any nation is Christian that is on this earth at this present time. While the sin and autrocites of American life continue.

Dr. Kennedy needs to take his robe off, no one with his supposed credentials should ever be considered a Doctor of Divinity or Ministry when he would deny the truth and stretch it to his benefit and his ideals that this nation was founded by God.

All nations will be judged by God including Israel and the United States of America.

Kennedy is still very fascinated with the kingdoms of this world. and should have his mind on heavenly things rather than trying to lift things up of this earth to his ideas of heaven on earth.

Dr. Kennedy needs a new focus - the Kingdom of God! The Kingdom of God is not America or Israel or any other nation on this earth.

In summary, I will tell you once again, it is impossible for Free Masonry and Christianity to ever be compatible - they are in direct contradiction to one another.

I wonder if Dr. Kennedy might have a Masonic ring on his finger or at least a few Masonic contributors to his ministry?

I challenge him to stay with the truth, preach the truth and flee the falsehoods he so wants to convince America of.

It is this kind of twisting of history that every totalitarian regime has exercised, to accomplish their task to brainwash the general public and be blind to truth.

Galatians 5:7-9

You were doing so well! Who made you stop obeying the truth? How did he persuade you? It was not done by God, who calls you. "It takes only a little yeast to make the whole batch of dough rise," as they say.

2 Timothy 4:3-5

The time will come when people will not listen to sound doctrine, but will follow their own desires and will collect for themselves more and more teachers who will tell them what they are itching to hear. They will turn away from listening to the truth and give their attention to legends. But you must keep control of yourself in all circumstances; endure suffering, do the work of a preacher of the Good News, and perform your whole duty as a servant of God.

Dr. J.

Cloned Meat and Dairy, Genetically Modified Food and Soylent Green

The FDA last December decided, even though most Americans have objected to this, they are going to allow cloned meat and dairy products to be released to the general public. Is this a good thing for the populace? What are it's effects on health and more?

I am going to express what I feel about the subject and what are it's origins and where it is headed and the damage already done.

Genesis 2:20-31

The Good News Translation

Then God commanded, "Let the water be filled with many kinds of living beings, and let the air be filled with birds."
So God created the great sea monsters, all kinds of creatures that live in the water, and all kinds of birds. And God was pleased with what he saw.
He blessed them all and told the creatures that live in the water to reproduce and to fill the sea, and he told the birds to increase in number.
Evening passed and morning came—that was the fifth day.
Then God commanded, "Let the earth produce all kinds of animal life: domestic and wild, large and small"—and it was done.
So God made them all, and he was pleased with what he saw.
Then God said, "And now we will make human beings; they will be like us and resemble us. They will have power over the fish, the birds, and all animals, domestic and wild,d large and small."
So God created human beings, making them to be like himself. He created them male and female, blessed them, and said, "Have many children, so that your descendants will live all over the earth and bring it under their control. I am putting you in charge of the fish, the birds, and all the wild animals.
I have provided all kinds of grain and all kinds of fruit for you to eat; but for all the wild animals and for all the birds I have provided grass and leafy plants for food"—and it was done.
God looked at everything he had made, and he was very pleased. Evening passed and morning came—that was the sixth day.

For several years, we have had a continual increases in cancer while foods have continually been genetically modified. There are very few of our vegetables that haven't had some sort of genetic manipulation by men. These foods were all modified just as they plan to give us cloned meat and dairy products, thinking that men can approve on what God has already done.

Note the last thing that is written in regards to what God's thought is : God looked at everything he had made, and he was very pleased.

Now, I ask you, if God created it as it is and was pleased, why do men think they can approve on what God has already done, without some sort of consequences.

These consequences are apparent, we have more people dying of cancer and diseases that were supposed to eradicated a long time ago, today then ever before.

The answer is, the corporations like Monsanto could care less what these genetically modified foods or cloned foods will do to you and your health, then they care about bottom dollar profit they will make. Greed and profit, is destroying the health of millions.

When men think they can improve on what God has already done, the only next step to be taken is human cloning.

Now, there are a few of you out there that may have remembered a science fiction movie called, "Soylent Green", made back in 1973.

Here is a synopis of the film as provided by Wikopedia:

Soylent Green is a 1973 science fiction movie starring Charlton Heston, Edward G. Robinson, Leigh Taylor-Young, Joseph Cotten and Chuck Connors. It is loosely based on the 1966 science fiction novella about overpopulation by Harry Harrison, Make Room! Make Room!, but diverges into its own plot points and ideas.
The film's title refers to the fictional artificial food product at the center of its plot. Due to the cult popularity of the film, the term "soylent green" and the movie's famous last line have become something of a catch phrase. Many subsequent works have referenced Soylent Green for dramatic or comedic effect.
Set in the year 2022, the film depicts a dystopia, a Malthusian catastrophe that takes place because humanity has failed to pursue sustainable development and has not halted population growth. New York City's population is 40,000,000, with over half unemployed. Global warming, air pollution and water pollution have produced a year-round heatwave and a thin yellow smog in the daytime. Food and fuel resources are scarce because of animal and plant decimation, housing is dilapidated and overcrowded, and widespread government-sponsored euthanasia is encouraged as a means of reducing overpopulation.
Meat, bread, cheese, fruit, vegetables and even alcoholic beverages are scarce and extremely expensive (example: a six-ounce jar of strawberry jam is 150 "Ds"). Farms that produce these foods are heavily guarded and off-limits to civilians (in addition to the factories where soylent products are manufactured). To most people, natural foods are a rarely, if ever, enjoyed luxury. The government dispenses rations of synthetic food substances made by the Soylent Corporation, such as Soylent Yellow and Soylent Red. The newest product, Soylent Green, the most popular version, is derived from plankton, according to the firm.
Soylent Green, Soylent's food products are mostly distributed as brightly-colored crackers which may be eaten with margarine, although they are also seen being sold as bread-like buns and in crumb form. The word "Soylent" is a combination of the words soybean and lentil (presumably, these are some of the ingredients of soylent's products, both being very high-yielding crops that are cheap to produce).
Specific Soylent products are distributed on different days of the week to the populace. However, even the supplies of this are limited and there is much competition between people to get their rations early. Such is the competition that if the supply runs out, rioting is common. To deal with this problem, the distribution centers have a heavy police presence, and they deal with the rioting crowds in a very heavy-handed way using "scoops"—special vehicles that scoop up people from the crowd and dump them into containers at the back. Such callous treatment is invariably fatal to a portion of the rioters.
By contrast, the rich elite live in spacious apartments, with regular access to "real food", tobacco and alcohol. Some can even afford "furniture", the film's terminology for concubines.
Charlton Heston plays Robert Thorn, a New York City police detective who investigates the murder of William R. Simonson (Joseph Cotten), a former member of the board of the Soylent Corporation. Thorn's elderly roommate is Sol Roth (Edward G. Robinson), a onetime college professor, now employed as a police researcher. Unlike most people in the world of the film, including Thorn, Sol had a formal education and is literate; education of any sort at the current time is only available to the wealthy elite. Such people are referred to as "books" (actual books being largely out of print due to lack of wood to make new paper, as well as a shortage of electricity and printing presses).
During his investigation of the Simonson murder, Thorn slowly uncovers a strange conspiracy, which would be revealed if he can see what goes on behind closed doors at the euthanasia centers. When an elderly and dispirited Sol opts for euthanasia, Thorn forces his way into the euthanasia center and makes two shocking discoveries.
First, he sees motion pictures of the beautiful Earth of former times, which are shown only to those about to be euthanized. He is startled and brought to tears when he sees how beautiful the Earth was before it sank to its current state.
Second, when Thorn follows the disposal of Sol's corpse, he discovers that Soylent Green includes the recycled bodies of people who have used government-sponsored euthanasia centers, leading to his famous outcry: "Soylent Green is people!"

Just how science fiction this is today, is to be debated. Especially the large corporation making food to be consumed by the populace on the idea that they are doing good. By the thousands we are eating food that has been modifed by men in laboratories. Already they have shown that cloning can produce mutations, and genetic modification of food has been researched by those opposing it, and they show there are some drastic things that can happen to the human body as a result of consuming these foods. I can remember when Taco Bell removed yellow corn tortillas for the longest from their menus, to avoid offering one of the first vegetables that Monsanto began to genetically alter. It doesn't matter now, because nearly everything you eat now, has had men playing with it in their Frankenstein laboratories.

Remember, in my article on salvation how we talked about good and evil having the same sources- Satanic. That only our Heavenly Father can produce real good - righteousness and holiness. Men thinking they are doing good. Better tasting, longer lasting, less destruction of crops and on and on they go. It is a merry go round that leads to death.

Men eventually will come to the conclusion, that he will be able to improve on the human as well. This will lead to authorized cloning of what the corporation or government conclude are the humans that are worthy of cloning. We can conclude they will do this just from the way the elite so worship theirselves already, they will eventually produce clones of themselves and those that they consider, wiser, more intelligent and more able to benefit society and "self".

Government and corporations always analyze all that they do with a cost-benefit analysis. This goes for human life as well. Thus the argument over stem cell research.

We are not living in science fiction anymore, we are living in science fact.

Nothing has anything really changed from the beginning of time, as the serpent, that old devil keeps whispering in men's ears the following:

Genesis 3:1-6

Now the snake was the most cunning animal that the LORD God had made. The snake asked the woman, "Did God really tell you not to eat fruit from any tree in the garden?"
"We may eat the fruit of any tree in the garden," the woman answered, "except the tree in the middle of it. God told us not to eat the fruit of that tree or even touch it; if we do, we will die."
The snake replied, "That’s not true; you will not die. God said that because he knows that when you eat it, you will be like Godm and know what is good and what is bad." The woman saw how beautiful the tree was and how good its fruit would be to eat, and she thought how wonderful it would be to become wise. So she took some of the fruit and ate it. Then she gave some to her husband, and he also ate it.

The age old story returns, "The woman saw how beautiful the tree was and how good it's fruit would be to eat, and she thought how wonderful it would to become wise."

Men today with all their genetic research and cloning, has looked and said in their heart, how beautiful is my creation over what God was pleased with, how good it will taste, and surely this proves that I am wise beyond God- for I have improved on something that he didn't. His creation was imperfect but now "Look at me, look at my creations"!

How long with the current philosphy of the elitist will it be before it comes to us eating Soylent Green.

When we like Charleston Heston, will go - "Soylent Green is people!".

Dr. J.